dwivian: (suffering for my art)
dwivian ([personal profile] dwivian) wrote2006-12-01 07:46 pm

well.......

Not good enough.
cavalaxis: (shit)

[personal profile] cavalaxis 2006-12-02 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
crap. now what?

[identity profile] gwinna.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
That's okay though. I know you worked extremely hard on it, but there's always room for improvement, and this is going to be the crowning achievement of your educational career, the thing that stays in print, and hopefully other people read, so there's certainly nothing wrong with taking these expert's opinions and using them to make your work the best it can be :)

Also, what's this about testing humans? ;)

Oh that blows

[identity profile] mustangsally78.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
And sucks like a shop vac.

::::offers virtual booze::::

If you have to do the human trials again, maybe you could involve cattle prods and get a laugh while doing it.

Fucktards.

Sal

[identity profile] yin-again.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 03:51 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, honey. I'm so sorry.
ext_10190: Doctor Who's Rose smiling (Default)

[identity profile] bailunrui.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
I'm so sorry.

[identity profile] xliquid-dreamsx.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well sir you know that old saying about if at first you don't succeed right? My complete oral career would have been over before it ever even got started if I'd been disheartened after my first go at it. Or my second or third or hell the whole first year even! So hang in there... the very best of things often take a bit of revision to become great.

[identity profile] ann-mcn.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
When I was taking online education courses at UGA, each separate school system had a special consent form to use; would your university have something analogous?

[identity profile] spiritchaser1.livejournal.com 2006-12-03 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
awww dammit. *sigh*