dwivian: (suffering for my art)
dwivian ([personal profile] dwivian) wrote2006-12-01 07:46 pm

well.......

Not good enough.

[identity profile] gwinna.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
That's okay though. I know you worked extremely hard on it, but there's always room for improvement, and this is going to be the crowning achievement of your educational career, the thing that stays in print, and hopefully other people read, so there's certainly nothing wrong with taking these expert's opinions and using them to make your work the best it can be :)

Also, what's this about testing humans? ;)

[identity profile] gwinna.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Sucky. How complicated was the test? Can you do it again?

[identity profile] gwinna.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
Uck. My condolences....

[identity profile] gwinna.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 02:14 am (UTC)(link)
Good luck! :)

[identity profile] zanna-voodoo.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
That is unfortunate, but fwiw, the human subject approval usually isn't too hard if it's not a medical or psychological test you're doing. The point is to be aware of potential risks of the test and assure the subjects have given informed consent. I went through the human subjects approval process for my thesis, (which originally was going to be a study via interviews and surveys,) and since the potential risk to my subjects was nearly nil, the approval wasn't difficult to get.

*hugs*

I know that you're bummed, but I agree that this will make your publication even better in the long run. Hang in there!

[identity profile] dangerdyke.livejournal.com 2006-12-02 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
good luck. i only vaguely remember when i got certified by NIH for human testing, but i remember it wasn't all that difficult. good luck with everything. have a beer and a footrub. get a footrun *in* beer..